Mathematics
On the weighted equivalence of open sets in $R^n$
V. A. Shlyk Vladivostok Branch of Russian Customs Academy
Abstract:
Ahlfors and Beurling gave a characterization in terms of extremal distances of the removable singularities for the class of analytic functions with finite Dirichlet integral. Following Ahlfors and Beurling refer a relatively closed set
$E$ contained in open set
$G\subset R^n$ as an
$NC_{p,w}$-set if
$E$ do not affect the
$(p,w)$-modulus
$m_{p,w}(F_{0},F_{1},\Pi)$ for every coordinate rectangle
$\Pi\subset G$.
Dymchenko and Shlyk established that
$NC_{p,w}$-sets are removable for the weighted Sobolev space
$L^1_{p,w}(G)$. Observe that the idea to study removable sets of this type in
$R^{n}$,
$n\ge2$, in terms of rectangle is not new and for
$w\equiv 1$ was considered by Hedberg, Yamamoto. In particular Hedberg gave the definition of null set
$E\subset \Pi$ for a certain condenser capacity and showed that such set
$E$ is removable for the class of real valued harmonic function
$u$ with vanishing periods,
$\int\left|\nabla u\right|^pdx<\infty . $ Also remark that
$NC_{p,w}$- sets were under investigation by Väisälä, Aseev and Sychev for
$p=n$,
$w\equiv $1; by Vodop'yanov and Gol'dshtein,
$w\equiv $1. For more fully information about
$NC_{p,w}$-sets,
$w\equiv $1, we refer to the book by Gol'dshtein and Reshetnyak “Quasiconformal mappings and Sobolev Spaces”.
Following Vodop'yanov and Gol'dshtein open sets
$G_{1}$ and
$G_2$ (
$G_1\subset G_{2}$) will be called
$(1,p,w)$-equivalent if the operator of restriction
$\theta$:
$L^1_{p,w}(G_2)\to L^1_{p,w}(G_1)$ is the isomorphism of the vector spaces
$L^1_{p,w}(G_2)$ and
$L^1_{p,w}(G_1)$.
In the present paper we have established the criterion of
$(1,p,w)$-equivalence of open sets in
$R^n$: In order to open sets
$G_1$ and
$G_2$ $(G_1\subset G_2\subset R^n)$ be (
$1,p,w)$-equivalent, necessary and sufficient that the set
$G_2\setminus G_1$ be an
$NC_{p,w}$-set in
$G_2$. This result generalize the earlier criterion by Vodop'yanov and Gol'dstein and it's proof is used the definition of null-sets for the Muckenhoupt weight condenser module in Ahlfors–Beurling sense.
Keywords:
modulus of curves family, condenser, capacity, Sobolev functions classes, Muckenhoupt weight.
UDC:
517.51
BBK:
22.161.5