RUS  ENG
Full version
JOURNALS // Pis'ma v Zhurnal Èksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki // Archive

Pis'ma v Zh. Èksper. Teoret. Fiz., 2020 Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages 388–393 (Mi jetpl6261)

This article is cited in 3 papers

METHODS OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS

Mirror pairs of quintic orbifolds

A. A. Belavinabc, B. A. Eremindcba

a Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow region, 142432 Russia
b Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 127994 Russia
c Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Dolgoprudnyi, Moscow region, 141700 Russia
d Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Skolkovo, Moscow region, 143025 Russia

Abstract: Two constructions of mirror pairs of Calabi-Yau manifolds are compared by example of quintic orbifolds $\mathcal{Q}$ . The first, Berglund–Hubsch–Krawitz, construction is as follows. If $X$ is the factor of the hypersurface $\mathcal{Q}$ by a certain subgroup $H'$ of the maximum allowed group $SL$, the mirror manifold $Y$ is defined as the factor by the dual subgroup ${H'}^{T}$. In the second, Batyrev, construction, the toric manifold $T$ containing the mirror $Y$ as a hypersurface specified by zeros of the polynomial $W_Y$ is determined from the properties of the polynomial $W_X$ specifying the Calabi-Yau manifold $X$. The polynomial $W_Y$ is determined in an explicit form. The group of symmetry of the polynomial $W_Y$ is found from its form and it is tested whether it coincides with that predicted by the Berglund–Hubsch–Krawitz construction.

Received: 03.09.2020
Revised: 03.09.2020
Accepted: 03.09.2020

DOI: 10.31857/S1234567820180111


 English version:
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 2020, 112:6, 370–375

Bibliographic databases:


© Steklov Math. Inst. of RAS, 2026